By George Mattathil – Forbes article, “How AT&T Can Go Shopping In Europe And Keep Its Credit Rating” by Maggie McGrath, provides an illustration how the financial markets are disconnected from reality and creates havoc with real businesses.
AT&T no longer has any competitive advantages, except its ability to borrow huge amounts of capital from financial markets. For starters, AT&T is not the company what most people think it is. Financial wizardry has reduced it to “at&t.”
Financially driven decision-making started at the original-AT&T with the decision to keep the then profitable long distance business and divest the technology (Lucent, Avaya, Agere) and the customer-connecting access networks (Baby Bells.) AT&T then followed it by another disastrous decision to buy TCI cable network, since it no longer had customer-connecting networks. As the original fantasies did not materialize, AT&T was forced to spin off the cable business to Comcast, and lost billions in the process. The result was one of the reconstituted Baby Bells, SBC, bought AT&T and renamed itself as the current ‘at&t’.
SBC had been mirroring the original-AT&T financial strategies for maximizing earnings — such as downsizing, shutting down research, not investing in network upgrades, etc. As an example, after the acquisition of Pacific Bell by then SBC, market leading research activities at Pacific Bell were terminated.
Current ‘at&t’ financial wizardry is based on customer-connecting networks of the constituent Baby Bells of past SBC.
Vodafone, in turn, benefited from Verizon’s financial wizardry. An estimated $20 billion investment by Vodafone in Verizon Wireless has turned into a $145 billion payback.
Seems the success of network operators is not based on how well they run their network operations, but how much they can borrow — a lesson learned probably by watching how Washington operates!
Impact of the financial wizardry by network operators is not limited to news generation, or even contained within their respective organizations. Network being a key enabler for economic activity, the costs and pain of network operator missteps are distributed to their customers and the entire economy. But the financial benefits from the wizardry are seldom shared, except, may be, as increase in share price.
Another impact, not easily identified, is the current turmoil at Alcatel-Lucent. AT&T used to be a major Lucent customer. But plans to migrate their infrastructure to VoIP (Voice-over-IP) make the current infrastructure and major Alcatel-Lucent product lines redundant. This has made it necessary for Alcatel-Lucent to reorganize their business operations. And placing a question mark on its future.♦
- The real reason for the IP-propaganda
- Alcatel-Lucent’s future is at risk: CEO
- How AT&T Can Go Shopping In Europe And Keep Its Credit Rating, Maggie McGrath, Forbes
- Telcos need to stay away from financial wizardry (theneteconomy.wordpress.com)
- Alcatel-Lucent to Reduce 10000 Jobs as Losses Mount – Bloomberg (bloomberg.com)
- Alcatel-Lucent challenges Cisco, Brocade unified access (pcadvisor.co.uk)
- Alcatel-Lucent challenges Cisco, Brocade unified access (infoworld.com)